Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 669 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 17% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2670 v2 - 182 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |