Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 1165 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2667 - 166 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €73.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |