Buy on Amazon
€211.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2057
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2057
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 136 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.