Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1453 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 135 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 189 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€872.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €872.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |