Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v2 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v2 is 552 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than FX-6200 - 241 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |