Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3857 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 115 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 33% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2665 - 157 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 32 vs 16 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€396.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €396.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |