Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2665 - 377 vs 321 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 65 vs 115 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
377
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |