Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2665 - 179 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2665
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
