Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 115 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 28% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5-2665 - 158 vs 123 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15542 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |