Buy on Amazon
€299.48
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $429
Availability
MSRP in USD: $429
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3966 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 86% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2665 - 82 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 7900
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
82
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€299.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 12-Core, 24-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for €299.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2665
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 9 7900
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.