Key Differences
In short — Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core Ultra 9 185H is 4300 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2660 - 221 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 22 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core Ultra 9 185H
Mobile • Dec 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ultra 9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | METEOR LAKE |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 2049 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 22 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 128EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
