Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3857 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 39% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2660 - 160 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€279.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €279.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |