Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4710HQ outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4710HQ is 160 days older than Xeon E5-2660 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4710HQ - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710HQ
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 52 vs 51 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 47 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Mobile • Apr 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-4710HQ |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 47 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |