Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 19% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 222 vs 186 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€221.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €221.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |