Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E5-2650L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2986 days newer than Xeon E5-2650L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 70 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 46% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2650L v2 - 223 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
223
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€230.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €230.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
70 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |