Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700 is 3422 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700
- Performs up to 38% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 211 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 7700
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
