Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2643 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3698 days newer than Xeon E5-2643 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 26% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 197 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 32 vs 12 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€359.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €359.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57711 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
628
20.205920205920204%
Multi-Core
3278
15.578367075373064%
Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |