Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4242 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Control than Xeon E5-2640 - 209 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€607.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €607.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58097 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
442
14.253466623669784%
Multi-Core
2284
10.876190476190477%
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |