Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 2949 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-2640 - 420 vs 370 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2640
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
