Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3966 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 74% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E5-2640 - 211 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
211
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€299.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €299.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
442
15.651558073654389%
Multi-Core
2284
13.641521830018515%
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |