Buy on Amazon
€62.8
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2679 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-2640 - 214 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-Core Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for €62.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2640
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.