Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 is 862 days newer than Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-3770 - 173 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 77 vs 90 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
161
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |