Buy on Amazon
€329.2
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $599
Availability
MSRP in USD: $599
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 34% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 154 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€329.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen™ 9 7900X3D 12-Core, 24-Thread Desktop Processor
Buy for €329.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.