Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2622 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 164 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€283.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €283.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 436 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |