Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1625 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 214 vs 210 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €109.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |