Buy on Amazon
€666.67
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $996
Availability
MSRP in USD: $996
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2637 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2637 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 53% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2637 v3 - 306 vs 200 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 - 120 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
306
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€666.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D 16-Core, 32-Thread Desktop Processor
Buy for €666.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2637 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
