Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1502 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 179 vs 173 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€312.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €312.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61013 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
868
52.038369304556355%
Multi-Core
4461
56.0427135678392%
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |