Buy on Amazon
€43.46
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $612
Availability
MSRP in USD: $612
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630L v3 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630L v3 is 1303 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G4900 - 115 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14005 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2630L v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.