Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 60 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 377 vs 318 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
377
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€186.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €186.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61755 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
426
19.62229387379088%
Multi-Core
2198
23.966852033584125%
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |