Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 730 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 198 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 51 vs 60 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |