Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3857 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 52% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2630 - 235 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2630
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i9-13900K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
