Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2630 - 216 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2630
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
