Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 13% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2630 - 144 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€215.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €215.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |