Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 584 vs 501 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
584
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€183.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €183.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |