Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600 is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600
- Performs up to 12% better in Deathloop than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 193 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-13600
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
941
38.61304883052934%
Multi-Core
5039
40.571658615136876%
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
