Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 243 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 32 vs 12 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
243
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€353.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57722 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
487
17.83882783882784%
Multi-Core
2427
14.094895173935768%
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |