Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1562 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-875K - 163 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 85 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
152
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€141.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €141.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |