Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 240 vs 224 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €66.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11043 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |