Buy on Amazon
€267.03
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $417
Availability
MSRP in USD: $417
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $599
Availability
MSRP in USD: $599
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 85 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 28% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 136 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€267.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen™ 9 7900X3D 12-Core, 24-Thread Desktop Processor
Buy for €267.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 232 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell-E | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.