Buy on Amazon
€239.43
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2060 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 134 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€239.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-9700F Desktop Processor 8 Core 3 GHz speed (Up to 4.7 GHz) Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W (BX80684I79700F)
Buy for €239.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13433 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.