Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1495 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 13% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 204 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €60.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65829 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
416
30.746489283074652%
Multi-Core
2118
44.608256107834876%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |