Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 1674 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 523 vs 503 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
523
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€165.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €165.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |