Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2614 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 85 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 336 vs 298 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
336
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €255.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |