Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2129 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 85 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 19% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 149 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 24 vs 6 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€263.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €263.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7715 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |