Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5-2430 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3887 days newer than Xeon E5-2430.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-2430 - 202 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2430 - 32 vs 12 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€353.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2430 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |