Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700U is 2428 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2420 - 176 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 15 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
No | Overclockable | No |