Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 372 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 172 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 20 vs 12 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2420 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2420 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
433
48.871331828442436%
Multi-Core
2148
39.94049832651543%
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
