Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2135 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 8% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 229 vs 213 FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |