Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1665 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700T - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 172 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€242.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €242.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15298 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |