Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 2744 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 13% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 692 vs 615 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
692
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €73.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10837 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105T |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |